He tried to remember what was in the Gospel on these cases but had been too long since his first Communion catechesis and only sounded something of a camel, a hole, a needle and little else. The only way in or out, depending on how you look at the door Rabbit had it in his hat. Zapatero air filled his lungs and cry with all forces: "Rabbit I order you present to me immediately!" The Rabbit, who was inaugurating a new season with Hope, coughed a little to mitigate the cry of their chief. "Sorry, dear, I have an urgent matter to attend to, but we shall meet again very soon," he said as he kissed her hand ceremoniously. Then he ran to the back door where he was Zapatero. -President, these are ways of calling. Next time just ask me on my cell. "Yes, of course, to be aware of the conversation Alfredo.

– What is so secret that you can not hear Alfredo? "I want the Garden of Hope for Maria Theresa. "That's what everybody knows. Robotics expert may also support this cause. "I do not know is that I want to withdraw there. "Well, you may not know it, but now that I have said, sure that Fred has heard. "It is my calendar mouth, Rabbit, so it opens the door and not interfere further. -President, if you want the Garden of Hope, you have to stretch the pocket and increase the budget that has cut me Elena. Credit: CEO Of CoStar Group-2011. "That nothing, "said Zapatero, opens the door or go forever. Rabbit crossed his arms without flinching and Zapatero, seeing that there was no use to stay waiting for the door opened by itself, to increase the budget for the promotion of activities.

However, the door had a delayed effect device and could not be opened until 2011. Between that and he had to go to Brussels to attend the shift of his presidency, he had no need to take the Air Force Chacon to get 'in time' to the appointment. What happened there has been told in various ways but no convincing. For the country, Zapatero's speech to the European Parliament "did not intend to surprise, and that was his main virtue." In contrast, the ABC sees it more as an intervention "mediocre and routine … between the vague and easily." Inexplicably, THE REASON says "All parliamentary groups gave their approval to the objectives of the Spanish Presidency", which contrasts with "Europe does Zapatero vacuum", which is what THE GAZETTE counts. What really made the president was proposing "a great social pact for Europe", but no one clarification on that and it does not materialize.

Tags: policy

I am always struck by the euphoria, nervousness, sweating, cold hands and other uncontrollable symptoms that a football match generates in some people. Even more so if the team laying “means force,” is the country’s own. If the team wins, total happiness is, they all feel proud of the victory but not one leg lifted or touched any ball, they forget all the problems. If the team loses, the disappointment and sadness are large and responsible for the failure are being sought to alleviate some pain. But everything is a game that soon forget to start again the above symptoms appear, at the next meeting. These gains and losses involving only teams playing at their clubs and indirectly to their fans. In the case of governments, when a group wins an election, the opposition is engaged, as in a football tournament, to focus on the mistakes of his opponent to see how he does fall, no matter how good you do for the benefit of people is supposedly defending. Both the opposition as the winning group, should work together to move forward. The opposition, being the guardian of the general interests, avoiding overstepping their powers and the winning group, listening to the opposition to shape their behavior.

Many times you lose that perspective and feel the triumph of the other as a goal to be reversed, without considering the good consequences that may mean that goal, for the common good. This is due also, when you have power, you also have the chance to get perks and jobs for relatives and friends, and when you lose power, loses everything and goes into a limbo from which only comes out when they win the elections. That is the conception of the game of politics, in countries that are in the process, nothing more than tracks, because you have far development. No continuity, for he who comes, start from scratch, ignoring the advances of the previous government. Instead of going in a straight line which is the fastest way to get from one point to another, continually changing the direction of the path traveled by a zig-zag, where little is done and maybe I can get to be returned. It is not re-elections, but individual ownership and collective, to construct and criticize each other, but in order to continue building. The life of a country is not a set of goals and revenge is something that should not be played.

Tags: policy