Archive for August, 2012

Technological Law

The evolution each day more makes in them to come across with new realities and facts until then never lived by all. They are social, technological, cultural realities, amongst other examples, that with passing of the days assume new forms, new yearnings and certainly they generate new attitudes. The society is inserted in a process of constant search for perfectionings and easinesses, and this Saga as well as its results generates new ways of interaction between people, and as all relation human being, acting by means of such new ways of interaction it needs to be regulated so that it does not have the breaking of these Rights of outrem on the part of some and opportune and of course they come to arguir not the responsibility for its action, therefore this is not a foreseen attitude as illegal in the effective normative system. The Internet, for example, is a constant in any part of the world, and this magnificent and wonderful one media needs also regularizations that come finally certain abuses behaviors that in it they occur and if they spread out. Our current legislation, as for example the Constitution, date of the year of 1988 and as well as our Bigger Letter, the technological and social advance makes with that, many times, the laws as soon as appear already are outdated. Thus, the Internet suffered in the country a growth and exponentially great popularizao, what many never would imagine, distanciando itself thus and very, of some possibility of a sprouting of efficient rules of law that dealt with impedies about the practised torts in the way. The computers, the main link between the person and the virtual world, in Brazil had come if to popularize only in the way of the decade of 1990 and then only had beginning the process of diffusion of the Internet in our country.

In middle of years 80 up to 1988 the legislator never could, or if he could, generally he would have a minimum notion to foresee the giant popularizao of the Internet and its ominous side that would come to happen on the social collective. technological time, inside of a small secular lapse such order already will meet of some outdated form. However the reality goes beyond, and the society – capitalist, technological, in the search for markets, the hunted one for segments of potential customers not yet explored, in the dispute for the status of leader company of the branch, in the dispute for the ownership of that it brings> preparation Internet, union of people of the same sex, and many other omissive ones. As well as all, the legislator also is human, has its tasks, its culture, its options of life, and obviously the distant one is not endowed with capacity to foresee the future much less next. Thus, exactly not being able to affirm what he will aconter in some minutes, days or years, the legislator, looking for one better legal abrangncia, must practise of certain forms a legal Prophylaxis. I explain: Although not to have premonitions, it must this if inform about the technological events, specialists, connoisseurs and all form of information that puddle to enrich its knowledge and together with other professionals to be able to mensurar some possible and future tort that comes to be practised, thus acting, preventing that the evil comes after to be fought its installation in the social environment and vitual. Everything, clearly, observing the legality and guided by the Federal Constitution.


Technology in Soccer

The use of technology in the soccer the soccer is the sport most popular of the world and the most practised in some countries, including Brazil. However, something that calls attention in this sport is the controversies caused for errors of arbitration. How many times a teams leaves to gain a game or until the championship for ' ' culpa' ' of the arbitration trio. Errors as impediments badly marked, pnaltis inexistent, ball that completely exceeds the line of the goal adversary and the judge order the game to follow, the famous goal of hand ' ' section Maradona' ' (he was known thus because Argentina gained the Pantry of the World of 1986 with a goal of hand of the aggressor Diego Maradona). A solution for these constant errors is the use of the field technology inside. The judge could be with a point and being informed for the room arbitrator (that it would be attending the game for the TV, having the possibility to stop one launches in case that this is doubtful), another idea would be to implant in ball one chip and sensors in the lines of deep of the field and these sensors would inform to the judge case the ball exceeded the line of deep entirely. For many critics these you launch controversial are part of the soccer and that this the aid to be the sport most popular of the world and that the use of any electronic component can make with that the soccer loses its ' ' magia' ' , Already for others the technology use is welcome and that it would be a form of if inside making field justice, making with that the teams that played better and deserved to earn, really earns. Already they had been made you vary experiences to help the judges (mainly in Brazil) as the use of sprays to inside mark lacks and barriers and two judges of field, then because not to make a test in a friendly game, for example, with use of technologies and to see the result to the end of the game if he is positive or negative.