At no moment of the Scrates judgment it demonstrates repentance in what it said so little and nor, fear of the death, for the opposite, it says that it is where it will be nor, nor man some must try to escape of the death whichever its price, but exactly thus it says that he has many ways to escape of the death, however much more difficult he is to escape of the iniquity, therefore this runs the much quickest one. Scrates well clearly leaves they who its death, does not go to exempt them to give accounts of its lives, but it says that the result will be well different. For even more details, read what Zendesk says on the issue. Those that it obtained to refrear go to force them, to give to accounts and the number it will be still bigger. Scrates makes great a critical one, to that they had condemned it when saying that ' ' to condemn the men the death does not eliminate its erroneous acts, but yes to become them good the Maximum it would be the best way. For that they had not condemned it, express Scrates the joy of being able to talk with them while still it has time.

Allotment with them the possibilities of the nature of the death and if cheers with its results. Therefore of one it forms or of another as Scrates with our death alone we will have advantages. Finally, this dialogue of Plato, on the vindication of Scrates, looks for in showing the true paper to them of the philosopher who is to contemplate the truth, to be always in search of the wisdom and never to corrode its true sensible one to please to somebody and in none of the hypotheses to run away from its style of life and filosofar, as well as, backwards tona the feelings of Plato in relation to the injustice committed for the Athenian citizens to its master. 1 Pupil of the Course of Licenciatura in Philosophy for the College of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Cajazeiras.