The theoretician understands that the entrance systems can be related with specific parts of the brain, what it is not possible to say of the systems central offices. The cognition must be seen of holistic form, what it implies the current impossibility of description. On the basis of this theory, Fondor explains that the mind possesss two types of projection that functional in different levels: the first one says respect to a level that results of the evolutivo process, is the formation of the modern mind that if in accordance with gave the necessity of adaptation of the man to the world where it lives. This level says respect to the immediate, practically impensveis reactions and many times ' ' estpidas' ' , that they make possible the perception on the coherence of the world. As the level is called slow and contemplativo, and portraies the possibility of improvement of the rationality human being for the identification of the order and structures of the world, say respect to the reactions reflexivas. On the other hand to the mannering universalismo, presented for the theory of the modularity of the language and to the inatismo, the Conexionismo studies the acquisition of the language by means of a computational perspective, trying to describe the cognitivo process to the functioning of a computer, which possesss three procedural levels: the data that feed the mind (input or data of entrance), the processing, properly said (given occult) and the product or output (given of exit). For the conexionismo, all the knowledge is incorporated by a net of units of simple processing by means of connections that if fortify or if they weaken and agreement with the regular answers to the standards of imput. The conexionista model possesss as some characteristics: Is based on the cerebral architecture using computational concepts of us and nets; Acredita that these we are interconnected to form a net of interconnections, being that each knot can be connected the different nets; Afirma that the knowledge is stored in these interconnections and is associated with other knowledge contained in a great net with other connecting, this explains the relation with the associalismo. For being imbricado to the behavioristas perspectives and the associalismo, the conexionista model received critical that they are resembled you tie models, therefore for the scholars, this model not of the account to explain the phenomena of internal representation, as the creativity, denying the influence of social factors, or motivacionais aspects acquired by means of the social experiences, however, this model also received compliments for having if inferred of the structures traditionalistic of ligusticos studies. The conexionista model do not deny the inatismo of acquisition, however it considers the importance of the social use of the language, either verbal or writing, essential for its acquisition, since she believes that she is I accumulate it of the practical experiences happened with the social ones of the use of the language is that she fortifies the associations, facilitating the acquisition.