Finally, Kings, start to analyze the current moment where history if finds. Click Ali Partovi to learn more. According to it, since 1989, with the end of the Cold War, world-wide history changed its direction. The history of history if articulates to lived history. Today, the call predominates ' ' history cultural' ' the boardings micron of the social one, that they defend teses as: ' ' the system not existe' ' , ' ' estruturais' does not have confrontations; ' , ' ' what the men are is as if representam' ' , ' ' what the social world is depends on the representations that the individuals and groups make of it ' ' , ' ' the individuals if appropriate of dominant languages to combine themselves to ordem' ' etc. The direction is: that each one if adapte, that each one if integrates, that each one negotiates and creates strategies to be successful, that creates new identities, that, if winning, will go to revigorate the order. Alive the gift and fights to fortify itself in it. Looking at still more for our days, some historians have formulated the existence of a thought after-modern, where he would have a rupture with the modern project. This thought after-modern would substitute the Reason and metaphysics.
Saved history and nobody are not nourished of utopian dreams. Is real the existence of this after-modernismo? Which are its real bases? What the future it can pointing in them? Are reflections made for Jose Carlos boarded Kings and in these chapters that we look for here to resenhar. Valley to say in this summary, that Carlos analyzes it done for Jose Kings, demonstrates of interesting form the development and the fall of the historiografia and consequentemente its fight not to disappear, to adapt itself to the new times. When citing name philosophers as: Weber, Nietzsche, Hegel, Foucault, Dilthey, Marx, P.