Holiness: No I am writing to refer to relations between Catholics and Jews. You support in 1965 “Nostra Aetate” document of the special church that ended after nearly two thousand years, the official anti-Christian Judaism. I think you have done and work on correcting the mistakes of the past and that has contributed to a rapprochement between Christians and their “elder brothers in faith” in the words of John Paul II. I am writing to talk about Israel, during his visit to the Holy Land. Ignore news that they report their synthesis and Councilors in the Vatican learned about Israel. In 1948, Paul Rassinier the author had been a professor of history for over twenty years and was saddened to read stories about the concentration camps and deportations that the defendant was not true. So scary in unilateral condemnation of Nazi Germany for crimes against humanity that his experience in Morocco, not only believed, and feared that the nationalist hatreds and bitterness divided Europe. As he explained in the lie of Ulysses:
‘A day to make a false picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was universal, not just one that could be provided by placing it on the threshold of the national socialists. The deportees – many of whom were communists – had been largely responsible for driving international political thought to a very mistaken conclusion. I suddenly felt that by remaining silent was an accomplice to a dangerous influence.
The first book Rassinier, crossing the line (1949), an account of his experience in Buchenwald, was a critical and immediate commercial success, which one reviewer described it as”the first written testimony cold and quiet resentment against the demands of I hate stupid or chauvinism. ” the union of journalists and writers also praised, and it was recommended reading by the SFIO. (18) is notable for its criticism of the government of the prisoner. Rassinier demand that the resistance was found only among the Russian prisoners, and that many brutalities in the field were not trusted by the SS, but because the prisoners mostly communists who took control of the Haftlingsfuhrung of commands and the internal affairs of the fields for their own advantage. Rassinier blame the high death rate in the two fields that he saw in his corruption.
His second book, the lie of Ulysses: A look at the literature of the inmates of the concentration camp (1950) caused controversy. Rassinier look at what he considered to be representative accounts of the fields. the exaggerations and criticize DENOUNCED authors, such as Eugen Kogon, that the organizations of the L’Enfer (1947) claimed that the main objective of the government of Buchenwald prisoner was”to keep a core of prisoners against the SS ‘ Rassinier stated that this core of prisoners looked out only for themselves, and other claims that the communists were trying to save their own skins after the war, saying that ‘taking by storm the bar of witnesses and end with the cry, around this spring. He also describes his visits Dachau and Mauthausen, noting that in both places, he got conflicting stories about how the gas chambers were supposed to have worked, and first expressed his doubts on the existence of gas chambers and a Nazi policy of extermination.
The book created a scandal, and the November 2, 1950, was also attacked on the floor of the French National Assembly. (19) but due to the caveat that Albert Paraz for the content of the book, and Rassinier Paraz were sued for slander by several organizations. After a seesaw round of trials and appeals, and Rassinier Paraz was acquitted, and an enlarged edition of the lie of Ulysseswas published in 1955, which sold well. However, the uproar has led to complaints from members of the SFIO, and April 9, 1951, Rassinier was expelled from the party ‘despite the connection that their person imposes,’ as the document of the expulsion notice. An effort of rehabilitation near pivert Marceau was rejected.
Rassinier spent the rest of the 50 who advocated socialism and pacifism. wrote articles for the defense of the man and the way of the peace, condemning the war in Indochina and Algeria, together with the financial policies of the postwar French. He also wrote for the counter-current of libertarian and anarchist newsletter of SIA (Anti-Solidarite Fasce international), as well as many other publications. In 1953, the public discourse on the last occasion – an introductory essay to the doctrines of peace, describing the ideology of pacifism, and in 1955 the parliament in the hands of banks, a condemnation of capitalism and French financial policy. His 1960 essay, the revolutionary was his only ambiguous theoretical work, an examination of the metaphysical and dialectical thinking revolutionary applied in part to a social analysis of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution. It was serialized in several papers, and a mildly successful version of the book was published in 1961.
Also in 1961, he returned to his previous themes with Odysseus betrayed by his own, an anthology of speeches he gave during a trip to the conference of the Germany city of twelve built around the third edition of the lie .